Grammar translation

1
Grammar-Translation Method
Contents:

Background
Principal Features & Theoretical Assumptions
Objectives, Syllabus, Teacher & Learner Roles
Key Features
Typical Techniques
Criticisms & Comments
References
2
Background
Faculty Psychology, a core concept of education in Europe in 18-19th centuries:
body & mind were separate; the mind consisted of three parts or faculties: the will, emotion, & intellect.
the intellect could be sharpened enough to eventually control the will and emotion.
The way to do this was through learning classical literature of the Greeks and Romans, as well as mathematics.
As a result, textbooks were essentially copied for the language classroom & GTM, or the Prussian Method as known in US, (Richards & Rogers 1986: 3) predominated in language teaching from the mid 1840s to the mid 1940s
The Traditional Grammar lays emphasis on correctness, literary excellence, the use of Latin models, and the priority (uu tien) of the written language.
The text books take prominent (loi lac) writers as language models. They concentrate on detailed points and favor the formality of language.
3
Principal Features & Theoretical Assumptions
Principal Features: emphasizes the teaching of the second language grammar; its principal practice technique is translation from and into the target language.
Theoretical Assumptions:
L2 primarily viewed as a system of rules to be observed in texts and sentences & to be related to first language rules and meanings.
Language learning regarded as intellectual activity which provides students with good mental exercises to develop their minds. It consists of little more than memorizing rules and facts by means of massive translation practice in order to understand and manipulate the morphology and syntax of the second language.
L1 is maintained as the reference system in the acquisition of L2.
4
Objectives, Syllabus, Roles
Objectives: Reading and writing are the major concern; little or no systematic attention paid to speaking or listening.
Syllabus: based on grammar & vocabulary. Grammar rules presented, illustrated & practiced through translation exercises. Vocabulary selection based solely on the reading texts used and a list of vocabulary items are presented with their L1 equivalents.
Learner & Teacher Roles: Wholly teacher-centered. The teacher is the authority of the classroom. Learners viewed as passive receivers of knowledge. They can learn only what the teacher knows.
Roles of First Language: L1 is the medium of instruction; used to explain new items and to enable comparisons to be made between the foreign language and the learner’s first language.

5
Key Features
L2 learning seen as an intellectual activity: deductive (pp dien dich) explanations of intricate grammar given and then practised through translation exercises
Strong emphasis on accuracy and form, fluency & meaning neglected
little interaction between the learners and the teacher; almost no interaction between students
Much vocabulary is taught in the form of lists of isolated words.
Grammar provides the rules for putting words together, and instruction often focuses on the form and inflection of words.
Reading of difficult classical literary texts right in early stages.
Common drills include exercises in translating disconnected sentences from L2 into L1.
Little or no attention is given to pronunciation.
6
Typical Techniques
Translation of a Literary Passage (Translating target language to native language)
Reading Comprehension Questions (Finding information in a passage, making inferences and relating to personal experience)
Antonyms/Synonyms (Finding antonyms and synonyms for words or sets of words)
Cognates (Learning spelling/sound patterns that correspond between L1 and the target language)
Deductive Application of Rule (Understanding grammar rules and their exceptions, then applying them to new examples)
Fill-in-the-blanks (Filling in gaps in sentences with new words or items of a particular grammar type)
Memorization (Memorizing vocabulary lists, grammatical rules and grammatical paradigms-mo hinh, he bien hoa).
Use Words in Sentences (Students create sentences to illustrate they know the meaning and use of new words)
Composition (Students write about a topic using the target language)
7
Criticisms of GTM
Even if GTM trained mind in logical thought, there is little evidence that this faculty is transferable to other walks of life beyond the language
GTM gives the wrong idea of what language is and of the relationship between languages: Language seen as a collection or words which are isolated and independent and there must be a corresponding word in the native tongue for each foreign word learned
GTM assumes that language is only acquired through translation skills, and this at the expense of oral skills
Low translation standard - caused by grammatical techniques which force learner to deduce L2 sentences by selecting from a multiplicity of rules and exceptions and individualized words.
The average school child not mentally mature enough to cope with this method
Learner motivation very low; this leads to frustration, boredom and indiscipline.
8
General Comments
Though GTM has received fierce attacks, it has its own advantages.
+ First, the use of first language facilitates learning, e.g. in grammar.
+ Secondly, the systematic learning of grammar is very important for those learners who want to understand the grammatical system of the language.
+ Finally, the formal features of the second language and translation as a practice technique put the learner into an active problem-solving situation.
The main weakness of GTM lies in its overemphasis on rules and its limitations of practice techniques which never free learners from the dominance of the first language. Besides, this method often creates frustration for learners since they tend to forget lists of words and rules of grammar.
Fails to develop communicative skills: very frustrating for learners when it comes to using it for real-life purposes
GTM is still common in many countries - even popular
9
Opinions
“It is a method for which there is no theory. There is no literature that offers a rationale or justification for it that attempts to relate it to issues in linguistics, psychology, or educational theory.”
Richards and Rodgers (1986:5)

“It requires few specialized skills on the part of teachers. Tests of grammar rules and of translations are easy to construct and can be objectively scored. Many standardized tests of foreign languages still do not attempt to tap into communicative abilities, so students have little motivation to go beyond grammar analogies, translations, and rote exercises.”
Brown (2001:19)
10
References
Brown, H. Douglas, 2001: Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Edition), Pearson Longman.
Larsen-Freeman, Dianne, 2000: Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (2nd Edition),  New York: Oxford University Press.
Prator, Clifford H. & Celce-Murcia, Marianne, 1979:  “An outline of language teaching approaches.”  In Celce-Murcia, Marianne & McIntosh, Lois (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language,  Newbury House.
Richards, Jack & Rodgers, Theodore, 1986: Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, New York: Cambridge University Press.